• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Language Engineering
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 11 (2024)
Volume Volume 10 (2023)
Volume Volume 9 (2022)
Volume Volume 8 (2021)
Volume Volume 7 (2020)
Volume Volume 6 (2019)
Volume Volume 5 (2018)
Volume Volume 4 (2017)
Volume Volume 3 (2016)
Volume Volume 2 (2015)
Volume Volume 1 (2014)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Daoud, D., Boitet, C. (2014). Correctness, Strength and Similarity Evaluation of Stemming Algorithms for Arabic. The Egyptian Journal of Language Engineering, 1(1), 17-23. doi: 10.21608/ejle.2014.59847
Daoud Daoud; Christian Boitet. "Correctness, Strength and Similarity Evaluation of Stemming Algorithms for Arabic". The Egyptian Journal of Language Engineering, 1, 1, 2014, 17-23. doi: 10.21608/ejle.2014.59847
Daoud, D., Boitet, C. (2014). 'Correctness, Strength and Similarity Evaluation of Stemming Algorithms for Arabic', The Egyptian Journal of Language Engineering, 1(1), pp. 17-23. doi: 10.21608/ejle.2014.59847
Daoud, D., Boitet, C. Correctness, Strength and Similarity Evaluation of Stemming Algorithms for Arabic. The Egyptian Journal of Language Engineering, 2014; 1(1): 17-23. doi: 10.21608/ejle.2014.59847

Correctness, Strength and Similarity Evaluation of Stemming Algorithms for Arabic

Article 2, Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2014, Page 17-23  XML PDF (301.11 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejle.2014.59847
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Daoud Daoud email 1; Christian Boitet2
1Princess Somaya University for Technology
2GETALP, LIG, Université Joseph Fourier, France
Abstract
In this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation of four Arabic stemmers, based on metrics for correctness, strength and similarity. Two data sets were used in this study. For correctness evaluation, we used a list of 8697 Arabic words grouped into 1606 conceptual classes. For similarity and strength evaluation, we used a list of 72,000 unique Arabic words. Conclusions about correctness, strength and similarity of the four Arabic stemming algorithms are reported.
Statistics
Article View: 177
PDF Download: 314
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.